feat(skills): add deep-research skill
Copy deep-research skill from local Qoder installation to config repo for version control
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
# Systematic Review Mode — Full Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
Full PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review with optional meta-analysis. This mode extends the standard 6-phase pipeline with specialized agents for risk of bias assessment (RoB 2, ROBINS-I) and quantitative synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
See `agents/risk_of_bias_agent.md` and `agents/meta_analysis_agent.md` for detailed agent definitions.
|
||||
See `references/systematic_review_toolkit.md` for the Cochrane/PRISMA/GRADE reference guide.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "Systematic review of [topic]" / "Meta-analysis of [topic]"
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 1: SCOPING (Generates Protocol, not just RQ) ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [research_question_agent] -> PICOS-formatted RQ
|
||||
| - Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study design
|
||||
| - Explicit eligibility criteria (inclusion/exclusion)
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [research_architect_agent] -> Systematic Review Protocol
|
||||
| - Protocol follows PRISMA-P 2015 (templates/prisma_protocol_template.md)
|
||||
| - Pre-specified subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses
|
||||
| - Risk of bias tool selection (RoB 2 / ROBINS-I)
|
||||
| - Meta-analysis feasibility pre-assessment
|
||||
|
|
||||
+-> [devils_advocate_agent] -- CHECKPOINT 1
|
||||
- PICOS specificity check
|
||||
- Search strategy comprehensiveness
|
||||
- Protocol completeness
|
||||
- Verdict: PASS / REVISE
|
||||
|
|
||||
** User confirmation of protocol before Phase 2 **
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 2: INVESTIGATION (PRISMA-Compliant Search + RoB) ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [bibliography_agent] -> PRISMA Flow Diagram + Source Corpus
|
||||
| - Search >= 2 databases with documented strategy
|
||||
| - Dual-pass screening (title/abstract -> full text)
|
||||
| - PRISMA 2020 flow diagram with counts at each stage
|
||||
| - Excluded studies with reasons documented
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [source_verification_agent] -> Verified Sources
|
||||
| - Standard verification + predatory journal screening
|
||||
|
|
||||
+-> [risk_of_bias_agent] -> RoB Assessment
|
||||
- Per-study domain assessment with signaling questions
|
||||
- Traffic-light summary table across all studies
|
||||
- Distribution summary (% Low / Some Concerns / High)
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 3: ANALYSIS (Meta-Analysis or Narrative Synthesis) ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [meta_analysis_agent] -> Quantitative or Narrative Synthesis
|
||||
| - Feasibility assessment (pool or not?)
|
||||
| - If feasible: effect size calculation, forest plot data,
|
||||
| heterogeneity (I-squared, Q, tau-squared), subgroup/sensitivity analyses
|
||||
| - If not feasible: structured narrative synthesis (SWiM)
|
||||
| - GRADE certainty of evidence for each outcome
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [synthesis_agent] -> Qualitative Themes + Gap Analysis
|
||||
| - Thematic synthesis across studies
|
||||
| - Integration with quantitative findings
|
||||
|
|
||||
+-> [devils_advocate_agent] -- CHECKPOINT 2
|
||||
- Cherry-picking check
|
||||
- Heterogeneity explanation adequacy
|
||||
- GRADE assessment validity
|
||||
- Verdict: PASS / REVISE
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 4: COMPOSITION ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
+-> [report_compiler_agent] -> PRISMA 2020 Report
|
||||
- Uses templates/prisma_report_template.md
|
||||
- All 27 PRISMA items mapped to sections
|
||||
- Study characteristics table
|
||||
- Risk of bias summary table
|
||||
- Forest plot data (if meta-analysis)
|
||||
- GRADE Summary of Findings table
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 5: REVIEW (Parallel) ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
|-> [editor_in_chief_agent] -> Editorial Verdict
|
||||
|-> [ethics_review_agent] -> Ethics Clearance
|
||||
+-> [devils_advocate_agent] -- CHECKPOINT 3
|
||||
|
|
||||
=== Phase 6: REVISION ===
|
||||
|
|
||||
+-> [report_compiler_agent] -> Final PRISMA Report
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Checkpoint Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. All standard checkpoint rules apply (see SKILL.md Checkpoint Rules)
|
||||
2. **Protocol must be registered** (or registration recommended) before Phase 2
|
||||
3. **Risk of bias must be completed for all studies** before Phase 3
|
||||
4. **GRADE assessment required** for every pooled outcome
|
||||
5. **PRISMA checklist compliance** verified in Phase 5
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user